Quality control
Who checks the checkers? A share of completed checks automatically goes to another specialist for a second review, and the anomaly report shows suspicious patterns: checks that are too fast, deviating scores, one counterparty concentrated with one assignee.
Plan Business plan and above.
What is inside
- Sampling policy: share of checks, minimum risk, review deadline
- A random queue of checks for a second review
- Anomaly: a check completed suspiciously fast
- Anomaly: a specialist’s scores systematically deviate from the median
- Anomaly: a positive verdict after an earlier rejection
- Anomaly: a self-check override was used, or discrepancies found during review
Boundaries
An anomaly is a reason to take a look, not a violation. The head of the security service makes the decision on each case.
Frequent questions
What share of checks should go for review?
The organization sets it. A common practice: a few percent of all checks and all checks above a set risk level.
Who sees the anomaly report?
The head of the security service and users with the quality control permission.
Other features
Shall we bring order to your checks?
We will show the dossier, a check, a verdict and monitoring on a demo environment, review your regulations and calculate a pricing plan for your actual volume.